Introduction
Title: Oh, dear Stacy! Social interaction, elaboration, and Learning with Teachable agents.
Author bios:
Amy Ogan- is a postdoctoral student at Carnegie Mellon University in the Human-Computer Interaction Institute. She works on virtual agents for learning with other students
Samantha Finklestein- is a doctoral student at Carnegie Mellon University in the Human-Computer Interaction Institute.
Elijah Mayfield- is a doctoral student at Carnegie Mellon University in the Human-Computer Interaction Institute.
Claudia D'Adamo-
Noboru Matsuada
Justine Cassell
Title: Oh, dear Stacy! Social interaction, elaboration, and Learning with Teachable agents.
Author bios:
Amy Ogan- is a postdoctoral student at Carnegie Mellon University in the Human-Computer Interaction Institute. She works on virtual agents for learning with other students
Samantha Finklestein- is a doctoral student at Carnegie Mellon University in the Human-Computer Interaction Institute.
Elijah Mayfield- is a doctoral student at Carnegie Mellon University in the Human-Computer Interaction Institute.
Claudia D'Adamo-
Noboru Matsuada
Justine Cassell
Summary
What they did was basically observe how students from different grades interacted with a teachable agent that could supply a few different social responses to the child. They were trying to see what would have the most learning gain and how the way the children interacted with Stacy affected their learning gains. The hypothesis was: how do increased cognitive reflection moves, inside-system vs. outside-system language and increased social moves correlate with learning. The agent Stacy was to be taught linear equations from the child and the authors would observe how the child conversed with Stacy, if they called the agent "she" or "her" it was inside, if it was called "it" it was outside. They then evaluated the results by comparing how the student talked to Stacy and how much she learned or didn't learn and how much they learned.
What they did was basically observe how students from different grades interacted with a teachable agent that could supply a few different social responses to the child. They were trying to see what would have the most learning gain and how the way the children interacted with Stacy affected their learning gains. The hypothesis was: how do increased cognitive reflection moves, inside-system vs. outside-system language and increased social moves correlate with learning. The agent Stacy was to be taught linear equations from the child and the authors would observe how the child conversed with Stacy, if they called the agent "she" or "her" it was inside, if it was called "it" it was outside. They then evaluated the results by comparing how the student talked to Stacy and how much she learned or didn't learn and how much they learned.
Related Work
The work was novel and the way the authors talked about
related work was appropriate and helped with the overview of what has already
been looked at.
Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty's Brain
system
Virtual peers as partners in storytelling and literacy
learning
A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as
learning companions
Measuring self-regulating learning skills through social
interactions in a teachable agent environment
Modeling student behaviors in an open-ended learning
environment.
A Science Learning Environment using a Computational
Thinking Approach
Identifying Learning Behaviors by Contextualizing
Differential Sequence Mining with Action Features and Performance Evolution.
Supporting Student Learning using Conversational Agents in a
Teachable Agent Environment.
Relating Student Performance to Action Outcomes and Context
in a Complex, Choice-Rich Learning Environment.
Identifying Students Characteristic Learning Behaviors in an
Intelligent Tutoring System Fostering Self-Regulated Learning.
All of these papers do with learning from a teachable agent or interactive program, but none of them talk about what the authors of this paper talk about. Which is how social interaction can affect learning from a teachable agent
Their results were evaluated systemically, they took all of the data they collected from each child put it together and created a coding scheme that was applied to the things the children said aka "utterances" as they were teaching Stacy. The categories the utterances were put in were: a social utterance, a tutoring move, an alignment bases pronoun use, a cognitive assessment,a correctness evaluation and they also had a none category. Once they put all the utterances into the right category they looked for correlations between the categories and the learning gains. They also looked at shifts in behavior and how specific behaviors in the chilled affected upcoming alignment on a turn by turn basis. Since they took down the words the child said I think it was also evaluated quantitatively with a little bit of qualitative since they measured the learning gains with a pre and post test and found a normalized gain.
Discussion
I thought that the work and contribution were very interesting, I didn't think that teaching someone helped you learn but when I thought about it it made perfect sense. Also I didn't know that there were teachable agents that help with this. The way they evaluated the results seemed to be pretty appropriate to me since I couldn't think of another way to look at the data they acquired. The contribution was novel in my opinion the field has been researched but not in the way these authors did, the overall contribution should help with the future development of teachable agents to help kids learn in a different way.